Minnesota Murders Shoot a Hole in the Overton Window

“Alex Pretti was murdered, in public and on camera, by thugs. Period. If you’re lying to others about that, shame on you. If you’re lying to yourself about it, seek help.”

That’s my hot take on the Border Patrol’s public execution of an ICU nurse in Minneapolis over the weekend, and the varying reactions to it.

That’s exactly the reaction one might expect, given my prior disposition toward the war on immigrants and the ever-increasing militarization of the American police state, but the facts that have subsequently emerged don’t seem to merit substantive changes.

Pretti, an ICU nurse, came to the assistance of a woman who’d been knocked down and pepper-sprayed by badge-flashing goons, and was then knocked down and pepper-sprayed himself before being shot multiple times while pinned to the ground and unarmed (his pistol, which he hadn’t drawn, brandished, or fired, had already been stolen by one of his attackers at the time he was shot).

It’s a sad thing, and I don’t want to understate the sadness . His family and his friend and co-worker circles are now permanently one member lonelier. His previous and prospective patients are now one care-giver short. The world is a smaller and darker place due to his absence from it.

It feels almost blasphemous to look for an up side to this vicious crime, but I’ve got a Panglossian streak, so I’m going to give it the old college try (I dropped out of college, so think of it as a freshman attempt).

You may have heard of something called the Overton Window. Briefly defined, the “window” covers the range of positions on issues that enjoy mainstream acceptance. A position outside the “window” is, by definition, “extreme.” When a position stops being “fringe” and becomes “mainstream,” the “window” has moved.

Even a few weeks ago, my position on something like the murder of Alex Pretti — sadly not an uncommon occurrence, as cops kill hundreds, sometimes thousands, of Americans per year, many of them unjustifiably — was well outside the Overton Window.

Even a few weeks ago, most Americans “backed the blue” for the most part, even when “mistakes were made” or some unlucky innocent ran into a “bad apple.”

The ICE gang’s murder of Renee Good on  January 7 (also in Minneapolis) felt like someone grabbing the handle of the “window” and trying to take it loose.  SOME people still bought the lies and the excuses, but others took second, longer looks and accepted that what they saw was in fact what they saw.

The shots that killed Alex Pretti   shattered the window entirely.

Not just because it was obviously cold-blooded murder, but because the few government and “law enforcement” officials who tried to justify it were so clownishly dishonest and cartoonishly evil in their deliveries that no one with a shred of self-esteem could pretend to, and no one with an IQ over 40 could actually, believe them.

Even  US president Donald Trump, notorious for his ability to brazenly lie his way through nearly any scandal, has begun throwing his sycophant subordinates under the bus and driving over them to get to the center of the “window.”

Border Patrol gang shot-caller Gregory Bovino  was the first to go. He’s fled Minneapolis, minus his “commander-at-large” title and accompanied by panicked underlings.

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi “Ice Barbie” Noem’s neck has an ax hanging over it. If that ax falls, her plastic surgeon probably won’t be able to re-prettify it.

Democrats, and even a few Republicans, in Congress seem inclined to withhold funding for DHS, ICE, and Border Patrol unless the stormtrooper stuff stops. Some, perhaps, on principle, but mostly because every member of Congress prefers re-election to its alternative and the voters are, well, pissed off about this. As they should be.

The Overton Window is open … and we just may find a way to throw ICE out that window and slam it closed on Border Patrol’s trigger fingers.

There’s your up side, folks, your silver lining.  I wish we could have Alex Pretti, Renee Good, and the other victims of the immigration police state back, but since that’s not possible, the next best thing is to disarm, fire, and maybe even imprison their murderers.

Thomas L. Knapp (X: @thomaslknapp | Bluesky: @knappster.bsky.social | Mastodon: @knappster) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

PUBLICATION/CITATION HISTORY

Donald Trump’s Board of Piece (of the Action)

Donald John Trump official presidential portrait

On January 22, according to a White House press release, US president Donald Trump “ratified” the Charter of the Board of Peace, promising “a secure and prosperous future for Gaza that delivers lasting peace, stability, and opportunity for its people.”

I’ve seen a lot of media coverage regarding things like Trump’s $1 billion membership fee demand for countries wanting a seat on the board, which regimes are willing to pony up and which aren’t interested, etc. But a commenter — pseudonym “Skywalker” — on a website I work with (Antiwar.com) called my attention to some far more interesting details.

TL;DR: Donald Trump chairs the board, for life or until he doesn’t feel like chairing it anymore, enjoying absolute authority and choosing his own successor.

Longer version, in Q&A form with answers as direct quotes from the charter:

Q: Which states are represented on the Board of Peace?
A: “Membership in the Board of Peace is limited to States invited to participate by the Chairman” (who also has the power to remove those states).

Q: How will the board make decisions?
A: “Decisions shall be made by a majority of the Member States present and voting, subject to the approval of the Chairman.”

Q: How will subcommittees be chosen and operate?
A: “The Chairman may establish subcommittees as necessary or appropriate and shall set the mandate, structure, and governance rules for each such subcommittee.”

Q: How are disputes concerning the meaning or application of the board’s charter settled?
A: “[T]he Chairman is the final authority regarding the meaning, interpretation, and application of this Charter.”

Q: Who is the Chairman?
A: “Donald J. Trump shall serve as inaugural Chairman of the Board of Peace …. Replacement of the Chairman may occur only following voluntary resignation or as a result of incapacity, as determined by a unanimous vote of the Executive Board [remember, the Chairman gets a vote, and all actions of the board are subject to his approval], at which time the Chairman’s designated successor shall immediately assume the position …”

It’s not difficult to figure out what’s going on here.

The new organization is not a “Board of Peace,” it’s a “Board of Piece … of the Action for Donald Trump.”

We’ve already watched Trump knock down billions in new wealth as president, billing taxpayers for use of his own properties and tapping family and friends as proxies for everything from corporate takeovers to insider trading to cryptocurrency scams.

Now he’s setting himself up as all-powerful chairman for life of an organization that will handle — and hand out contracts disposing of — untold additional billions in Gaza aid.

Guess who will get those contracts?

Oh, for the good old days of the Biden family’s mere “10% for the Big Guy.”

Thomas L. Knapp (X: @thomaslknapp | Bluesky: @knappster.bsky.social | Mastodon: @knappster) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

PUBLICATION/CITATION HISTORY

Carney Speech: The Rupture is a Necessary Part of the Transition

Jefferson Davis inauguration

“We are in the midst of a rupture, not a transition,” Canadian prime minister Mark Carney told the world’s self-designated elite in a January 21 speech. “[G]reat powers have begun using economic integration as weapons. Tariffs as leverage. Financial infrastructure as coercion. Supply chains as vulnerabilities to be exploited. You cannot ‘live within the lie’ of mutual benefit through integration when integration becomes the source of your subordination.”

Carney delivered his musings to the World Economic Forum in Switzerland, days after visiting China and striking a major trade deal with its regime.  That deal represents both a “rupture” with Canada’s former first-line trade partner, the United States, and a “transition” to something else.

Why the rupture? Why the transition?

Under US president Donald Trump (and, to some degree, Joe Biden), we’ve seen all the things Carney complained about in his speech.

When your main buyer (or, rather, the lord and master of your main buyers) becomes reluctant to buy from you — even if it means he (or, rather, his serfs) have trouble selling to you — you eventually start looking for other buyers and sellers. That’s the transition.

And, eventually, you find those new buyers and sellers and, to at least some degree, swear off coddling the old ones. That’s the rupture.

Writ large, Canada’s move away from the US and toward China is just  the latter part of Mike’s answer, in Ernest Hemingway’s The Sun Also Rises — “Two ways. Gradually, then suddenly” — to the question of how he went bankrupt.

Which, in turn, is just a waypoint in another transition. In Mike’s case, it was all downhill from the bankruptcy. In America’s case, who knows?

It’s easy to just blame Trump for all this craziness, but it’s also a little bit lazy.

Yes, Trump’s trade and economic policies seem purpose-built for the task of dismantling American prosperity at home and power (“soft” and “hard”) abroad.

In reality, though, the American empire and the supposed global “rules-based order” have been in continual decline pretty much since that happy accident 80 years ago, when World War 2 ended with most of the world’s industry wrecked, but America’s untouched.

It’s all been downhill from there … gradually.

We may have finally reached the “suddenly” point.

We were always going to.

It may be that with Trump, as William Lowndes Yancey said of Jefferson Davis upon his arrival in Montgomery, Alabama in 1861, “the man and the hour have met.” You may remember how that turned out. In both cases, the man’s identity was unimportant. There was going to be a man,  there was going to be an hour, there was going to be a rupture, and there was going to be a transition.

I consider myself lucky, in many ways, to have lived the bulk of my likely lifespan during the “gradually” phase. Americans, including myself, have had it fat and happy  for a very long time. That time is nearing its end.

I just hope America can find its way to a better transition than Mike managed.

Thomas L. Knapp (X: @thomaslknapp | Bluesky: @knappster.bsky.social | Mastodon: @knappster) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

PUBLICATION/CITATION HISTORY