Well, at least he hasn’t started any NEW wars!
For four years, that was the excuse I got from anti-war Donald Trump supporters every time he escalated one of the several wars he inherited from George W. Bush and Barack Obama.
I expect to start hearing it from anti-war Joseph Biden supporters soon.
Trump was Schrodinger’s President. He campaigned as simultaneously opposed to “endless wars” and “the most militaristic” president in history. He presided as mostly the latter, while continuing to campaign as the former.
Exiting stage right, he left Joe Biden teed up for a foreign policy grand slam, with three easy, peasy, no-brainer foreign policy base hits and two chances at a home run.
Potential base hit #1: Holding up the US end of the Afghanistan peace deal Trump negotiated with the Taliban. America’s second-longest war could be ending, but Biden’s still dithering.
Potential base hit #2: Restoring and building on Obama’s attempt at a relationship change with Cuba, which Trump dismantled. Instead of taking the hit, then stealing second base by unilaterally ending more than 60 years of meddling and embargo, Biden’s just quacking about lifting some of Trump’s reimposed restrictions and pitching “talks” about the rest.
Potential base hit #3: Replacing Trump’s fake “withdrawal” of US forces from Syria with a real one (Trump massively escalated the Syria conflict, then drew troops back down to Obama-era levels and pretended that was “withdrawing”). Instead, in late February, Biden authorized US airstrikes in Syria, supposedly to retaliate for an attack on US contractors and troops in Iraq (where they shouldn’t have even been) but more likely to prove his belligerence to doubters in the military-industrial complex’s amen corner.
The grand slam home run: Bringing the US back into compliance with the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, aka the “Iran nuclear deal,” which Trump violated (he didn’t “withdraw” from it — it’s a UN Security Council resolution and legally binding on all UN member states).
Biden campaigned on resuscitating the deal, and could have done so on his first day in office by simply bringing the US back into compliance. Instead, he’s hemming and hawing, offering “talks” the Iranians aren’t interested in and trial-ballooning new “conditions” he expects them to agree to before he’ll commit to obeying the law.
That’s four slow, fat pitches right across the plate, and Joe Biden seemingly can’t seem to bring himself to take a swat at them.
On foreign policy, Joe Biden’s presidency is shaping up a lot like Donald Trump’s and Barack Obama’s — lots of promises, with mostly only the bad ones likely to be delivered on.
If you were expecting something different, it looks like you got conned. And the worst is probably yet to come.
Thomas L. Knapp (Twitter: @thomaslknapp) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.
- “Biden’s Foreign Policy: No joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Richmond, North Carolina Observer, 03/02/21
- “Biden’s Foreign Policy: No Joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Anchorage, Alaska Press, 03/02/21
- “Biden’s foreign policy: No joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Arab American News, 03/03/21
- “Biden’s Foreign Policy: No Joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Creston, Iowa News Advertiser, 03/03/21
- “Biden’s foreign policy: No joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Hopkinsville, Kentucky New Era, 03/03/21
- “Biden’s Foreign Policy: No Joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, CounterPunch, 03/04/21
- “Biden’s Foreign Policy: No Joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, OpEdNews, 03/04/21
- “Biden’s Foreign Policy: No Joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Ventura County, California Citizens Journal, 03/04/21
- “Biden’s foreign policy: No joy in Mudville,” by Thomas L. Knapp, Havasu City, Arizona News-Herald, 03/08/21