US President Barack Obama’s late March visit to Cuba, continuing his initiative to re-establish friendly relations between the two countries, arouses opposition on both sides of the aisle in Washington.
The Republican complaints, of course, are to be expected. If Obama walked across the Florida Strait without wetting the hems of his trousers, Ted Cruz would ask why the president can’t swim.
But some Democrats also oppose breaking the ice with Havana. “It is totally unacceptable for the president of the United States to reward a dictatorial regime,” says US Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ). “The president is again prioritizing short-term economic interests over long-term American values.”
Let’s be honest here: Cruz, Menendez and their ilk have done as much to prop up Fidel Castro’s regime as Castro’s own secret police agents or neighborhood “Committees for the Defense of the Revolution” ever could, if not more. Half a century and change of sanctions and embargo have strengthened, not weakened, popular support for the island nation’s Communist rulers.
National isolation is the desire of every dictator: If his subjects never see what a freer society looks like or have the opportunity to avail themselves of its goods and services, they have no standard against which to measure his rule and find it wanting.
If a powerful, threatening external enemy actively aids him in achieving that isolation, so much the better: For now even if his subjects DO get a glimpse of higher living standards and relative freedom to travel, speak and worship, he can just blame that external enemy for denying them such things.
This is the dynamic which has kept the mullahs in charge in Tehran since 1979 and the Communist Party in charge in Havana since 1959. It is this dynamic which Obama hopes, by way of burnishing his presidential legacy, to interrupt with his Jeffersonian (“friendship and commerce with all nations”) overtures to Cuba.
The beneficiaries of the US embargo on Cuba have been the Castro regime, the US military industrial complex, the US sugar industry, and a few professional “opposition exiles” living on CIA funds and hoping to one day ride into Havana on American tanks. Its victims are legion and include the entire populations of Cuba and the United States.
Just as it was a myth that “only Nixon could go to China,” any president could have gone to Havana. One finally has. And we’re all better off for it.
Thomas L. Knapp (Twitter: @thomaslknapp) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.
- “Obama Visits Havana: Cuba Libre for Real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Pahrump Valley, Nevada Times, 03/24/16
- “Obama Visits Havana: Cuba Libre for Real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Antiwar.com, 03/25/16
- “Obama Visits Havana: Cuba Libre for Real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, OpEdNews, 03/25/16
- “Obama Visits Havana: Cuba Libre for Real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Key West: The Newspaper, 03/25/16
- “Obama Visits Havana: Cuba Libre for Real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Ventura County, California Citizens Journal, 03/26/16
- “Obama visits Havana: Cuba libre for real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Marietta, Georgia Daily Journal [print and paywalled web editions], 03/27/13
- “Cuba libre for real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Richmond, Virginia Legacy, p. 7 (online and print), 03/30/16
- “Obama visits Havana: Cuba Libre for real?” by Thomas L. Knapp, Montgomery, West Virginia Herald, 04/12/16