I Don’t Know’s On Third

RGBStock.com Vote Pencil

Philip Rucker and Robert Costa of the Washington Post report that Mitt Romney and other establishment Republicans are unsheathing their threatened final sword: Attempting to put together an “independent” Republican presidential campaign versus GOP nominee-apparent Donald Trump. The draft effort’s reputed short list includes Ohio governor John Kasich and US Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE). Good idea or bad idea? Depends on how one looks at it.

If the goal is partisan Republican victory this November, two Republican candidates — one chosen by the voters, one chosen by the party bosses — is a very bad idea. Two well-funded, ably promoted Republican candidates on the same ballots means a Democratic win. So let’s assume that winning the election is not what this move is about.

If the goal is preserving the Republican Party’s “soul” — its core ideology — we’re also looking at a very bad idea here. Why? Simple: The Republican Party HAS no core ideology. Maybe it did once upon a time, but these days it’s just an ad hoc coalition of interest groups and identity politics blocs like the Democratic Party. The GOP leadership’s problem with Trump isn’t lack of appeal to its traditional demographics (whites, males, evangelical Christians, people whose livelihoods depend on a hawkish foreign policy, etc.). The GOP leadership’s problem with Trump is that he’s displacing them in their role as Pied Pipers.

But that second prospective goal does hit somewhat close to the mark. The real purpose of an “independent Republican” campaign against Trump is to give anti-Trump members of the Republican coalition another Republican to vote for so that those voters don’t abandon the GOP for good in favor of the Libertarian Party or Constitution Party.

How real is the danger of such abandonment? I don’t know. But I do know that to the extent that the danger is real, it is a danger created by decades of Republican failure to deliver on the  things Republicans supposedly stand for.

The Libertarian Party might or might not be able to deliver on lower taxes, balanced budgets, civil liberties and George W. Bush’s promise of a “humbler foreign policy.” The Constitution Party might or might not be able to deliver on the pro-life agenda. They haven’t had their chance to deliver yet. The Republicans — under the influence of their “leadership” — have had, and blown, chance after chance. Now they’d rather put up with four years of Hillary Clinton than face the music they themselves made.

The Republican establishment created Donald Trump. Now they’re paying for their hubris with the disintegration of their party. A fake third party campaign won’t save the GOP. Real third parties simply have more to offer. Or at least their offers are more believable.

Thomas L. Knapp (Twitter: @thomaslknapp) is director and senior news analyst at the William Lloyd Garrison Center for Libertarian Advocacy Journalism (thegarrisoncenter.org). He lives and works in north central Florida.

PUBLICATION/CITATION HISTORY


Also published on Medium.

  • Delaney Coffer

    “The real purpose of an “independent Republican” campaign against Trump is to give anti-Trump members of the Republican coalition another Republican to vote for so that those voters don’t abandon the GOP for good in favor of the Libertarian Party or Constitution Party”

    Nigga pleez. The opposition to Trump is mostly stylistic. It’s incredibly shallow for most people striking this “never trump” pose. The republican party enthusiastically supported people like Gerald Ford, Bob Dole, Herbert Walker Bush, etc.. None of these people had policy positions wildly different than those of Donald Trump. And, by the way, nobody “created” Donald Trump. Donald Trump has simply revealed the nature of the modern republican party. It isn’t some pointy headed army of latter day Russel Kirks. It’s people sick to fucking death of their country being burned to the ground by scumbag leftists.

    This noise about a third party run is pure bullshit. It will never happen. Besides, there’s already a third party I thought. hehe

  • Rocketman

    “Two well-funded, ably promoted Republican
    candidates on the same ballots means a Democratic win. So let’s assume
    that winning the election is not what this move is about.”
    That is exactly what it is about. Trump, love him or hate him is his own man and can’t be controlled by the party bosses while Hillary is bought and paid for.even if she is a democrat. The third party Neocon candidate is to give the election to Hillary.